Cambridge Education

Asbestos Lawsuit History

Lawyers like Stanley Levy have helped many asbestos victims. People with mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases can sue companies who mined, manufactured or used asbestos and asbestos-containing products.

The first asbestos lawsuit was filed by Nellie Kershaw. She worked at a factory that made asbestos fibers in England and was diagnosed with health issues. She died at age 33 of fibrosis in the lung caused by asbestos exposure.

The First Cases

Asbestos is a hazardous mineral that has afflicted or killed thousands of people over time. Asbestos claims can be filed for many reasons, but they typically involve those who were exposed to the substance at work. This includes employees who worked in factories that produced asbestos-related products or on the construction site of buildings that contain asbestos. It can also be people who were exposed to asbestos by using household products, such as talcum powder.

Those who were exposed to asbestos could be afflicted with a variety of illnesses like mesothelioma, lung cancer and other respiratory conditions. Many have been awarded compensation for their injuries, even though some of these diseases are fatal. This is because many countries have laws that require companies that create dangerous substances to warn people who might be hurt by them.

The first asbestos lawsuit that was filed in 1929 involved a woman by the name of Anna Pirskowski. She was suffering from shortness of breath and thickening of the fingertip tissue (known as clubbing). She received a settlement amounting to $75,000 in what is believed to be a first class action lawsuit that involved asbestos.

In the years following there were a lot of asbestos lawsuits were filed. Asbestos litigation became a very vast area of law and many lawyers started to specialize in asbestos litigation. They only accepted cases that were extremely serious. One firm that did this was Kazan Law, which in the latter half of the 1980s began to focus on the bringing of cases on behalf of people who had mesothelioma.

Other lawsuits were won by people who had suffered from other asbestos-related illnesses such as asbestosis or plaques in the pleural cavity. This is because the condition that caused these was very similar to mesothelioma, making it more straightforward for lawyers to prove. These claims also led to the disclosure of secret documents that showed how asbestos-related manufacturers tried to conceal the risks. This led to the Asbestos Ban and Phase Out Rule being issued in 1989.

The Second Cases

As the number of people diagnosed with asbestos-related illnesses grew, the victims and their families began bringing lawsuits against companies that mined, manufactured or sold asbestos-containing products. Additionally, mesothelioma patients filed lawsuits against the companies that designed and constructed the buildings they worked in, such as shipyards, power plants, factories and refineries. The connection between mesothelioma and asbestos exposure is very strong.

In the early 1980s, the legal fights over asbestos attorney lawsuits got more ferocious, and courts began to rule on various aspects of case processes. A federal court, for example decided that only those suffering from malignant asbestos-related diseases like mesothelioma and lung cancer could take on asbestos manufacturers. products. This ruling, referred to as Borel V. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. was a major setback for asbestos litigation.

Around the same time, Nellie Kershaw, a factory worker from Rochdale, England, filed what is thought to be the first well-known legal case against asbestos companies. Kershaw, a factory worker from Rochdale in England, was diagnosed with lung problems caused by her frequent exposure to asbestos fibers in raw form. She attempted to convince her employer to cover the cost of treatment. However, the company refused. Kershaw passed away in her 30s from fibrosis.

The second round of asbestos cases focused on those who worked in construction sites and were exposed to different kinds of asbestos-containing building materials including fireproofing sprays textures and drywall products. Asbestos lawyers also successfully brought cases against companies that manufactured the equipment that made use of asbestos-containing products, such as boilers and pumps.

During this period, a variety of incriminating documents were uncovered that revealed asbestos companies' involvement in fraud and conspiracy. The documents included the personal documents of Johns-Manville President Sumner Simpson and correspondence from the general attorney for another asbestos lawyer producer, Raybestos Manhattan. These documents revealed a shady alliance between these companies to hide asbestos' dangers and deflect efforts to educate the public.

The discovery of these and other forms of corporate fraud and collusion in the mid- to late 1980s sparked a wave of class action settlements as well as other efforts to limit asbestos liability for asbestos-related companies. These attempts were met with fierce resistance from plaintiffs’ attorneys as well as their clients and the public.

The Third Cases

In the 1970s, asbestos-related companies were no longer able to conceal the devastating effects of asbestos-related illnesses like mesothelioma from the general public. This was due in large part to the fact major national publications began to pay attention to the link between mesothelioma, asbestos, and other respiratory diseases, instead of small industry medical journals and newsletters. After asbestos-related serious illness were well established and patients began filing lawsuits against asbestos-related companies.

In the 1970s, a court decision which allowed plaintiffs to make recourse to strict liability as a legal principle was among the major reasons for an increase in asbestos lawsuits. Plaintiffs in asbestos cases would be required to prove that asbestos producers were negligent in exposing them. In the 1973 case Borel v. Fibreboard a judge ruled asbestos manufacturers accountable for any injuries resulting from their products if they knew their product was dangerous but did not inform their employees or the general public about the dangers.

In the wake of this ruling, a number of asbestos-related companies have filed for bankruptcy, a procedure that allows a business to reorganize in bankruptcy court, and put money in trusts to pay for asbestos claims, and continue to be in operation. Johns-Manville is a notable example. It was hit by numerous lawsuits filed by former employees who were suffering from asbestosis, mesothelioma, or lung cancer. Kazan Law brought several cases against the manufacturer, and was able to obtain punitive damages verdicts against it.

Since the time asbestos litigation has continued to grow due to the growing number of people suffering from asbestos-related diseases. Asbestos lawsuits are often complicated due to the ailments they cause can take decades to manifest and are not always apparent to those who are diagnosed.

In addition there have been cases where victims were forced to wait for years to receive compensation from insurance companies after their employers were found to be liable. The US Supreme Court has addressed several cases in which asbestos companies attempted to limit their liability by offering class action settlements. It also has discussed whether individual defendants can be held accountable for asbestos related injury.

The Fourth Case

Asbestos, a substance that is extremely harmful, has sickened and killed hundreds of thousands over the years. It's also a substance that was extensively used by companies that knew that it was dangerous but continued to employ it in their manufacturing processes.

As the legal system deals with these asbestos lawsuits and asbestos attorney lawsuits, new developments take place every day. One of the most significant legal developments is the ruling Lubbe v. Cape Plc. This set an example for asbestos victims to sue multinational companies in their home countries for compensation.

Often, these cases are accompanied by secondary exposure to asbestos. Workers who handle asbestos at work can transfer it to their family members or spouses. Family members are affected by mesothelioma as well as other asbestos-related diseases.

This type of case is the basis of many lawsuits filed by relatives of victims in the present. Asbestos lawyers can aid families file a claim against the company responsible for their loved ones' asbestos injuries.

The rise of class action lawsuits is a major change in asbestos litigation. These asbestos lawsuits offer victims the chance to pursue justice with the help of an attorney well-versed in the legal issues these cases present.

While a lot of asbestos lawyers have pushed for this type of litigation, there are also some who oppose it. In fact there have been numerous attempts to pass legislation restricting the use of class actions in asbestos cases.

The most recent major change in asbestos litigation is the filing of a suit by Massachusetts residents against four companies for handling asbestos removal and disposal. The lawsuit claimed that the companies violated state laws in not properly disposing asbestos and failing residents from toxic dust.

Asbestos litigation is a long-standing problem that will likely persist for a long time. The asbestos industry has attempted to shield itself from responsibility by using legal arguments based on technicalities and by attempting to pass legislative remedies that would block victims from seeking justice. It seems that many victims, as well as their lawyers are determined to get justice acted upon.